Over the last year my thought
process has shifted from analyzing the social issues from the perspective of
the United States, to understanding how to address the disparity that exists in
the global context. The question that was constantly turning at the back of my
mind was what could I do on the ground to directly improve the lives of others
in these impoverished countries. This was the issue that
drove me to apply for for the global immersion India program in order to better
understand how to impact the challenges that are being experienced by those in
poverty in disadvantaged communities across the world.
However, what I did not expect was
how this trip would serve as a catalyst in shifting my thinking from how to
solve these problems to why such a global inequality exists. What
kind of world culture have we subscribed to that has resulted in being
comfortable with allowing other countries to be economically disadvantaged
and detaching ourselves from a global responsibility or humanity. Rooted in the
battle between want and need, I often feel as though we have left others behind
in our never-ending desire for an economic advantage. How can we in the United States want so many
things while others still lack the basic necessities needed to survive. This concept truly hit home when our program coordinator Deepa told
a story in which her response to the death of a child in the community was met
with the comment, “Why are you crying? Children die all the time.”
This unfortunately is not just a
simple issue between countries who have and have not, but one that also exists
within these countries. This concept was highlighted while visiting a Palace
located on a 500 acre cashew farm in Jawhar and its juxtaposition to the farming
villagers we had met down the road. While the farmers are attempting to attain
the maximum potential from their small area of land in order provide the
essentials for their families, the owner of the palace sits lavishly miles away
reaping the benefit of his land. The result of the inequality that exists in
our culture most often results in disempowerment, while the inequality that
exists within India and across the world can result in death of children. It is
easy to say that we must first address our own problems in our country before
we can help others, but how much do we want before we decide to address the
basic needs of children.
While creating a global compassion
for humanity that changes the way we live is not an issue that can be easily
tackled, addressing the needs of children should be at the foundation. A
commonality I observed during conversations and presentations by the Social
Enterprise students of the Tata institute was providing support to children
while also utilizing them as a vehicle of change. The two ventures that
highlighted this focused on building community engagement through a toy
library, and confronting gender bias’ by exposing young boys to the job
responsibilities of women in the community. In order to change the future
culture of the world we must start with not only providing children the support
they need but also instilling the values that will change the systemic issues
we face as a world.
One does not need to travel across the globe
to find the suffering of children; it already exists across the border in Mexico.
In addition to understanding what services to provide to illegal immigrants in
the United States, or putting up fences up to lock them into this poverty, what
types of social entrepreneurship opportunities can we begin to implement that
are proactive and not reactive?
So how do we raise the bar for all of humanity and create
global unity? There is no simple answer to this question, but we should be able to agree
that children deserve the chance to be that change.
Hi Brian! I enjoyed your thoughts about fostering children to become agents of social change. Social ills are so complicated and can be paralyzing but our future lies in them. However, this does not absolve us from implementing interventions now and from trying to solve the problems that we face at present. Also, your analysis of the status quo between the United States and India makes me immediately think of the very different development stage each country is in. India is still a developing country while we live in a post-industrial society. This is not meant as a justification for how things are but rather a reminder to myself that context definitely matters. If anything, this India trip had rekindled and validated my desire for direct practice with foster youth in our country. Our stay gave me a renewed perspective that clients' voices matter first. Thanks for your post and hope to see you again in the future!
ReplyDeleteWow Brian! What a great post! Traveling abroad to developing nations really opens our eyes to the way other people live. While we do see poverty in the U.S., the poverty that we see in India is on a completely different level. All of the stories we heard about children dying of starvation and malnutrition really gives light to the extreme poverty and overpopulation in India. Because there are no formal child labor laws, children are seen as a disposable asset.
ReplyDeleteWhat you say is so true... the change must come from the children. Children's minds are flexible, so we must help to educate them in a way that emphasizes social equity. This education should not only take place in the developing world, but must be done in more developed and globalized countries.
Hello Brian, I really appreciate for your thoughts about poverty,help needy people . Those who suffer from this we all have to help them ,provide better education,support them in every situation whenever they want.Hope so everybody should read this post and start its work to improve the country.
ReplyDeleteStudy Abroad